Political pressure is growing for lenders to cut mortgage principal for
borrowers who find themselves underwater now that property values have
plummeted.
Executives from the nation's four largest banks - Bank of America,
Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase - pushed back against that
pressure Tuesday at a House Financial Services Committee hearing. They argued to lawmakers that reducing mortgage principal only makes sense
for a handful of borrowers with high-risk loans, and that a large-scale
principal forgiveness program could have dire ramifications for the future
of housing finance and consumers' access to credit.First American CoreLogic estimates that more than 11 million borrowers owe
more on their mortgage than the home is worth. To bring these underwater borrowers "even" to a loan to value (LTV) ratio of
100 percent would carry an industry-wide price tag of $700 billion to $900
billion, projects JPMorgan Chase. The cost to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and
the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) alone would be in the neighborhood
of $150 billion, according to the prepared testimony of one of the bank's
execs."Like all loans, mortgage contracts are based on a promise to repay money
borrowed," David Lowman, CEO of JPMorgan Chase Home Lending, testified.
"[T]here is no provision in the mortgage contract, express or implied, that
the lender will restore equity or reduce the repayment amount if the value
of the collateral depreciates."Lowman asked lawmakers, "If we re-write the mortgage contract retroactively
to restore equity to any mortgage borrower because the value of his or her
home declined, what responsible lender will take the equity risk of
financing mortgages in the future? What responsible regulator would want
lenders to take such risk?""Principal forgiveness is not an across-the-board solution," Michael Heid,
co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, told the committee. "[It] needs
to be used in a very careful manner."Heid said Wells began using principal forgiveness as an element of its loan
modification programs in January 2009 "in appropriate circumstances," and
has had "positive results." He also told lawmakers that "absent any unexpected legal, regulatory, or
accounting issues," Wells Fargo plans to implement the administration's
recently announced principal write-down initiatives for both first- and
second-lien modifications "as rapidly as possible."Sanjiv Das, president and CEO of CitiMortgage, stressed that principal
reductions are "one of many options that must be used responsibly," and
should be carefully considered before implementing in scale. "We believe principal reduction is not the only solution for those who are
experiencing financial hardship," Das said.Bank of America announced a new program last month to reduce mortgage
balances for about 45,000 severely underwater homeowners. Barbara Desoer,
president of Bank of America Home Loans, told the House committee that such
modifications are appropriate for customers who have high loan to value
ratios and are experiencing hardship, but must balance the interests of the
customer and the investor.Desoer also noted that the principal write-down practice raises the issue of
"fairness" to other homeowners who pay their mortgages every month - some of
them making difficult choices and sacrifices to do so, she said.Several lawmakers present at the hearing also questioned the "fairness
issue." Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) said, "We must remember that 94 percent of
Americans own their home outright, rent, or are current on their mortgage,
and they are being asked to bailout the other 6 percent. It's a policy that
says to the citizens who work hard, who live within their means, who save
for a rainy day, 'you are a sucker.' When you are struggling to pay your own
mortgage, you shouldn't be forced to pay your neighbors as well."Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Alabama) added, "The market needs to find its own
footing free of government intervention and manipulation so we can revive
our economy and get on with a full housing market recovery."The House committee hearing follows the Obama administration's announcement
last month that it is revamping the Home Affordable Modification Program
(HAMP) to encourage servicers to write down principal on loan balances that
are over 115 percent of the current value of the property. The "alternative
modification" includes incentive payments for each dollar of principal cut
by servicers and investors, but this piece of the program is voluntary and
will take months to implement, Treasury says. Promote your business and
services online and offline, find out when our next mixer is.Connect with other successful
womenReal Estate Investing Education,
take advantage of today's real estate marketBuild Your Business-Drive Your Dream Promo
Code: legendwww.TotalSolutionsAlliance.com Connect with me on Facebook
Twitter LinkedIn
borrowers who find themselves underwater now that property values have
plummeted.
Executives from the nation's four largest banks - Bank of America,
Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and JPMorgan Chase - pushed back against that
pressure Tuesday at a House Financial Services Committee hearing. They argued to lawmakers that reducing mortgage principal only makes sense
for a handful of borrowers with high-risk loans, and that a large-scale
principal forgiveness program could have dire ramifications for the future
of housing finance and consumers' access to credit.First American CoreLogic estimates that more than 11 million borrowers owe
more on their mortgage than the home is worth. To bring these underwater borrowers "even" to a loan to value (LTV) ratio of
100 percent would carry an industry-wide price tag of $700 billion to $900
billion, projects JPMorgan Chase. The cost to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and
the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) alone would be in the neighborhood
of $150 billion, according to the prepared testimony of one of the bank's
execs."Like all loans, mortgage contracts are based on a promise to repay money
borrowed," David Lowman, CEO of JPMorgan Chase Home Lending, testified.
"[T]here is no provision in the mortgage contract, express or implied, that
the lender will restore equity or reduce the repayment amount if the value
of the collateral depreciates."Lowman asked lawmakers, "If we re-write the mortgage contract retroactively
to restore equity to any mortgage borrower because the value of his or her
home declined, what responsible lender will take the equity risk of
financing mortgages in the future? What responsible regulator would want
lenders to take such risk?""Principal forgiveness is not an across-the-board solution," Michael Heid,
co-president of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, told the committee. "[It] needs
to be used in a very careful manner."Heid said Wells began using principal forgiveness as an element of its loan
modification programs in January 2009 "in appropriate circumstances," and
has had "positive results." He also told lawmakers that "absent any unexpected legal, regulatory, or
accounting issues," Wells Fargo plans to implement the administration's
recently announced principal write-down initiatives for both first- and
second-lien modifications "as rapidly as possible."Sanjiv Das, president and CEO of CitiMortgage, stressed that principal
reductions are "one of many options that must be used responsibly," and
should be carefully considered before implementing in scale. "We believe principal reduction is not the only solution for those who are
experiencing financial hardship," Das said.Bank of America announced a new program last month to reduce mortgage
balances for about 45,000 severely underwater homeowners. Barbara Desoer,
president of Bank of America Home Loans, told the House committee that such
modifications are appropriate for customers who have high loan to value
ratios and are experiencing hardship, but must balance the interests of the
customer and the investor.Desoer also noted that the principal write-down practice raises the issue of
"fairness" to other homeowners who pay their mortgages every month - some of
them making difficult choices and sacrifices to do so, she said.Several lawmakers present at the hearing also questioned the "fairness
issue." Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) said, "We must remember that 94 percent of
Americans own their home outright, rent, or are current on their mortgage,
and they are being asked to bailout the other 6 percent. It's a policy that
says to the citizens who work hard, who live within their means, who save
for a rainy day, 'you are a sucker.' When you are struggling to pay your own
mortgage, you shouldn't be forced to pay your neighbors as well."Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Alabama) added, "The market needs to find its own
footing free of government intervention and manipulation so we can revive
our economy and get on with a full housing market recovery."The House committee hearing follows the Obama administration's announcement
last month that it is revamping the Home Affordable Modification Program
(HAMP) to encourage servicers to write down principal on loan balances that
are over 115 percent of the current value of the property. The "alternative
modification" includes incentive payments for each dollar of principal cut
by servicers and investors, but this piece of the program is voluntary and
will take months to implement, Treasury says. Promote your business and
services online and offline, find out when our next mixer is.Connect with other successful
womenReal Estate Investing Education,
take advantage of today's real estate marketBuild Your Business-Drive Your Dream Promo
Code: legendwww.TotalSolutionsAlliance.com Connect with me on Facebook
Twitter LinkedIn
via Ping.fm
No comments:
Post a Comment